Older Buildings Research (OBR) Professional Engineering Expert Advice Role

{
  "awards": [
    {
      "id": "1",
      "items": [
        {
          "additionalClassifications": [
            {
              "description": "Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services",
              "id": "71000000",
              "scheme": "CPV"
            }
          ],
          "deliveryAddresses": [
            {
              "country": "GB",
              "countryName": "United Kingdom",
              "region": "UK"
            }
          ],
          "id": "1",
          "relatedLot": "1"
        }
      ],
      "mainProcurementCategory": "services",
      "relatedLots": [
        "1"
      ],
      "status": "active",
      "suppliers": [
        {
          "id": "GB-COH-03831898",
          "name": "Useful Simple Group Limited"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "buyer": {
    "id": "GB-PPON-PDZG-3487-DPVD",
    "name": "Department for Education"
  },
  "contracts": [
    {
      "aboveThreshold": true,
      "agreedMetrics": [
        {
          "description": "Deliver at least two rounds of sensitivity analysis and provide written feedback on three targeted model elements during Beta testing.",
          "id": "1",
          "observations": [
            {
              "id": "frequency",
              "period": {
                "durationInMonths": 1
              }
            }
          ],
          "title": "No.1 KPI"
        },
        {
          "description": "Complete analysis and Beta testing support ahead of final model deployment.",
          "id": "2",
          "observations": [
            {
              "id": "frequency",
              "period": {
                "durationInMonths": 1
              }
            }
          ],
          "title": "No.1 KPI"
        },
        {
          "description": "Respond to 100% of DfE LLM workflow requests within 5 working days, with a satisfaction rating of 80% or higher.",
          "id": "3",
          "observations": [
            {
              "id": "frequency",
              "period": {
                "durationInMonths": 1
              }
            }
          ],
          "title": "No.3 KPI"
        },
        {
          "description": "Complete scoping and selection for all February fieldwork schools by and deliver all summer and October fieldwork interpretation by February 2026. Deliver February fieldwork interpretation, where possible to do so, by the end of the contract. Tailor the fieldwork scope to suit budget constraints as advised by DfE, prioritising tests that fill data gaps. Enhances dataset completeness and reduce abortive costs through targeted testing and engineering-led insight.",
          "id": "4",
          "observations": [
            {
              "id": "frequency",
              "period": {
                "durationInMonths": 1
              }
            }
          ],
          "title": "No.4 KPI"
        },
        {
          "description": "Social value commitment:\nThe Consultant commitments to delivering 4 people-hours of learning interventions under the scope of this contract, to support Learning and skills development opportunities relevant to the contract to address skills gaps, with the aim of kills for growth, supporting growth sectors and addressing skills gap trhe KPI shall be measured using the following formula:\nActual performance (hours delivered) divided by 4 hours (social value\ncommitment), equals (outcome)\nWork example:\n4 hours delivered divided by 4 hours committed = 100% performance",
          "id": "5",
          "observations": [
            {
              "id": "frequency",
              "period": {
                "durationInMonths": 1
              }
            }
          ],
          "title": "No.5 KPI"
        }
      ],
      "awardID": "1",
      "dateSigned": "2026-03-03T00:00:00+00:00",
      "documents": [
        {
          "description": "Redacted copy of the contract",
          "documentType": "contractSigned",
          "format": "application/pdf",
          "id": "A-13453",
          "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/A-13453"
        },
        {
          "description": "conflictOfInterest",
          "documentType": "contractSigned",
          "format": "application/octet-stream",
          "id": "A-13454",
          "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/A-13454"
        },
        {
          "description": "conflictOfInterest",
          "documentType": "contractSigned",
          "format": "application/octet-stream",
          "id": "A-13455",
          "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachment/A-13455"
        },
        {
          "datePublished": "2026-03-17T16:09:10Z",
          "description": "Contract details notice on Find a Tender",
          "documentType": "contractNotice",
          "format": "text/html",
          "id": "024239-2026",
          "noticeType": "UK7",
          "url": "https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/024239-2026"
        }
      ],
      "hasOptions": true,
      "id": "1",
      "options": {
        "description": "Annex A - Fee and Other Payments. Clause 5. The daily all-in rate for any necessary extension of the Services work (and for the purposes of\nany apportionment under clause 11 .6.2.1) is REDACTED."
      },
      "period": {
        "endDate": "2026-03-31T23:59:59+01:00",
        "startDate": "2026-03-03T00:00:00+00:00"
      },
      "status": "active",
      "title": "Older Buildings Research (OBR) Professional Engineering Expert Advice Role",
      "value": {
        "amount": 116333,
        "amountGross": 139600,
        "currency": "GBP"
      }
    }
  ],
  "date": "2026-03-17T16:09:10Z",
  "id": "024239-2026",
  "initiationType": "tender",
  "language": "en",
  "ocid": "ocds-h6vhtk-05f8c9",
  "parties": [
    {
      "address": {
        "country": "GB",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom",
        "locality": "London",
        "postalCode": "SW1P3BT",
        "region": "UKI32",
        "streetAddress": "Sanctuary Buildings, 20 Great Smith Street"
      },
      "contactPoint": {
        "email": "PolicyAssurance.COMMERCIALQUERIES@education.gov.uk",
        "name": "Robert.ALEXANDER@education.gov.uk"
      },
      "details": {
        "classifications": [
          {
            "description": "Public authority - central government",
            "id": "publicAuthorityCentralGovernment",
            "scheme": "UK_CA_TYPE"
          }
        ]
      },
      "id": "GB-PPON-PDZG-3487-DPVD",
      "identifier": {
        "id": "PDZG-3487-DPVD",
        "scheme": "GB-PPON"
      },
      "name": "Department for Education",
      "roles": [
        "buyer"
      ]
    },
    {
      "address": {
        "country": "GB",
        "countryName": "United Kingdom",
        "locality": "London",
        "postalCode": "EC4Y 0HP",
        "region": "UKI31",
        "streetAddress": "Temple Chambers, 3-7 Temple Avenue"
      },
      "contactPoint": {
        "email": "info@expedition.uk.com"
      },
      "details": {
        "publicServiceMissionOrganization": false,
        "scale": "sme",
        "shelteredWorkshop": false,
        "url": "https://expedition.uk.com/",
        "vcse": true
      },
      "id": "GB-COH-03831898",
      "identifier": {
        "id": "03831898",
        "scheme": "GB-COH"
      },
      "name": "Useful Simple Group Limited",
      "roles": [
        "supplier"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "tag": [
    "award",
    "contract"
  ],
  "tender": {
    "description": "The Department for Education (DfE) requires further specialist technical services from an existing supplier to support the final phase of the Older Building Research (OBR) project. The OBR project has already been procured and a consortium bid was successful; of which the supplier was a party, fulfilling the Engineering Expert role as a subcontractor to the prime supplier. This supplier is Useful Simple Group Limited.\nThrough the OBR project, the DfE is investigating, cataloguing and extrapolating the condition of the post-war education estate, including through onsite intrusive investigations. This research project will enable the DfE to improve its understanding of the post-war education estate. This work is underpinned by a bespoke risk model, designed using research and investigations conducted to date and based on the technical assumptions and interpretative approach applied by the Engineering Expert Advice role. The project requires a further final phase not originally included in the contract with the prime supplier successful in the original procurement. This final phase involves interpreting and enhancing fieldwork inputs for model development, support on Large Language Model (LLM) workflows to support LLM development, providing engineering-led interpretation of fieldwork findings to enhance model relevance and insight, and applying the already established fieldwork approach across up to six additional schools, developing proposals for alternative methodologies to enhance data quality and fieldwork insights.\nTo ensure continuity and compatibility with the research and model developed to date, the services under this additional appointment must be delivered by the supplier who fulfilled the Engineering Expert Advice role in the original procurement and using the same technical assumptions and interpretative approach previously developed by them and applied. This consistency is essential; the model and supporting analysis have been built incrementally as a single coherent system.\nIntroducing outputs based on different assumptions and knowledge base would require significant re-engineering and re-validation of existing work, creating disproportionate technical complexity and undermining the integrity of the model.\nThe appointed supplier will provide engineering-led interpretation of the above scope to integrate new data into the current risk model without compromising its structure or functionality. These services will enable the DfE to maintain a consistent technical approach, ensuring that new findings complement and strengthen the existing evidence.",
    "documents": [
      {
        "description": "Not published",
        "documentType": "conflictOfInterest",
        "id": "conflictOfInterest"
      }
    ],
    "id": "Project_10272",
    "legalBasis": {
      "id": "2023/54",
      "scheme": "UKPGA",
      "uri": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/54/contents"
    },
    "lots": [
      {
        "id": "1",
        "status": "complete"
      }
    ],
    "procurementMethod": "direct",
    "procurementMethodDetails": "Direct award",
    "procurementMethodRationale": "Additional or repeat goods, services or works - extension or partial replacement\nJustification under Paragraph 7, schedule 5:\n(a) The justification applies where the contracting authority is procuring services from i) an existing supplier ii) which are an extension to existing services and iii) in circumstances where a change in supplier would result in the receipt of services different from or incompatible with the previous services and iv) this difference would result in disproportionate technical difficulties. All four tests are met here:\n(b) As regards i), the supplier was part of the winning consortium in the original procurement as a subcontractor to the prime and therefore is the existing supplier of these services. The Contracting Authority now needs to contract directly with this supplier.\n(c) As regards ii) these research services are an extension to existing research services as it is the final phase where 6 additional schools will be added;\n(d) As regards iii), The next phase of the OBR project requires the same fieldwork approach to be applied across 6 additional schools and for alternative methodologies to be developed and tested. In order for new findings to be compatible with earlier work, this must be done using the same assumptions and interpretative approach that had been applied previously, in the existing research and risk model.\n(e) As regards iv), Iif a different supplier were appointed, the interpretation of earlier and new fieldwork would inevitably be carried out using different professional judgements and assumptions. This would change how findings are assessed and how they are used to inform the model. As a result, the outputs produced would not be compatible with the existing model and the data used to inform it. It would risk wasting the work already done.\nConsequently, a change in supplier would result in the Department receiving services and outputs that are different and incompatible with those already developed. This incompatibility arises from how the model and supporting work are conducted and built up incrementally over the course of the project, and not due to cost, time, or other considerations.\nFurther and finally, it should be noted that the value is currently anticipated to be below threshold by \u00a388 and therefore this Transparency Notice is voluntary at the current time as the contracting authority also has the ability to award a below-threshold contract to the supplier. However if for whatever reason the value exceeds the threshold, ad the contract becomes a Convertible Contract, then the contracting authority will seek to rely on the direct award exemption at Schedule 5 paragraph 7.",
    "procurementMethodRationaleClassifications": [
      {
        "id": "additionalRepeatExtensionPartialReplacement"
      }
    ],
    "status": "complete",
    "title": "Older Buildings Research (OBR) Professional Engineering Expert Advice Role"
  }
}